Achieving True Diversity: The Power of Inclusion and Evidence-Based Recruitment Strategies

Mercuri Urval is a global executive search and talent advisory firm headquartered in Stockholm, Sweden. The firm was founded in 1967. Today, Mercuri Urval works with more than 3,000 clients – across all sectors – in over 70 countries every year. It is the only global executive search and leadership advisory firm based in the Nordics. Darcie Murray is senior vice president and head of the Americas of Mercuri Urval. Based in Houston, she conducts C-suite and senior executive level engagements and advises clients on disciplined hiring and human capital issues. Her experience spans across multiple sectors including professional advisory services, industrial, financial services & life sciences and healthcare and she has a passion for diversity, equity & inclusion. Ms. Murray is responsible for the growth of the business in the United States, and across the Americas for Mercuri Urval, as well as further developing the import and export business for the firm. Her responsibilities include client engagement and service, search execution, talent acquisition for Mercuri Urval in the Americas and professional development.

November 14, 2024 – How is diversity successfully achieved?

At Mercuri Urval, we believe that true diversity is achieved through inclusion. When all organizations practice genuine inclusion, diversity naturally follows. To ensure true inclusion, it’s essential to avoid stereotyping and subjectivity in our actions and behaviors. Achieving diversity requires a combination of strategies and efforts at both organizational and societal levels. It’s an ever-evolving topic, and while there are no easy fixes, it’s crucial to get it right.

How can HR executives leverage their role to improve diversity and inclusion within their organizations?

HR executives can improve inclusion and diversity (I&D) by ensuring recruitment processes are inclusive and fact-based, avoiding subjective biases. We advise our clients to implement structured search and selection processes which use predictive analysis and evidence-based criteria to include diverse candidates while focusing on competence and organisational needs. By actively monitoring inclusion at each stage, HR leaders can widen the pool of candidates and ensure fair, fact-driven selection decisions, ensuring long-term success and enhancing organisational diversity.

What are some of the most effective methods for recruiting HR executives who are committed to advancing diversity and inclusion?

One effective method is using tailored recruitment tools. For example, HR executives can be recruited through systems that prioritize the inclusion of diverse candidates by setting precise criteria based on specific leadership challenges in the inclusion and diversity area.
This avoids tokenism and ensures that candidates are assessed based on their abilities and fit for the role, rather than based on e.g. membership of specific networks or demographics. Going beyond traditional networks is one example of how a structured process can yield a diverse, competent slate of candidates.

How do HR executives measure the effectiveness of diversity and inclusion programs, and what metrics are most useful?

HR executives should track both qualitative and quantitative metrics. They can use industry benchmarks to monitor skew in selection processes, measuring how well diverse candidates are represented at different recruitment stages. Additionally, they should assess
the long-term success of appointed leaders by monitoring their performance in the role and their contributions to a more inclusive workplace. Fact-based evaluations and diversity distribution analysis can provide insights into the effectiveness of inclusion and diversity efforts.

What challenges do HR executives face when implementing diversity and inclusion initiatives, and how can these challenges be overcome?

HR executives often struggle with bias in recruitment and the pressure to hire for appearances rather than outcomes. This can lead to tokenism or stereotyping, which undermines both diversity and organisational success. Overcoming these challenges requires structured, evidence-based recruitment processes, which eliminate bias by focusing on measurable criteria and accurate selection, reducing the influence of subjective judgment.

How can HR executives balance the need for diverse perspectives with other organizational goals and priorities?

Balancing diversity with organisational goals requires HR executives to focus on inclusive recruitment while maintaining high standards for competence and performance. By setting precise, fact-based criteria for recruitment and using stepwise, evidence-driven selection processes, HR can ensure that diverse candidates meet the organisation’s needs. This balance can be achieved by ensuring that diversity complements the organisational objectives, rather than being pursued in isolation. McKinsey found that ethnically diverse organizations are 36 percent more likely to outperform companies that are less diverse. Consistently, studies have shown that companies who prioritize DEI and embed it into the fabric of their strategy and business, are more profitable and have healthier corporate cultures.

Can you share some practices that your firm takes to ensure a diverse slate of candidates is presented?

At Mercuri Urval, we practice “MU Inclusive Candidate Acquisition”, which targets diverse candidates within and beyond traditional networks. Our approach includes structured mapping of target organisations and adjacent talent pools. We also use fact-based inclusion and selection procedures that monitor for bias and ensure the recruitment of qualified candidates based on evidence rather than personal connections or demographics.

Share This Article

RECOMMENDED ARTICLES

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments